m
Add 'nowiki'.
Fireheart& (talk | contribs) (Topic: Canonicity) |
Fireheart& (talk | contribs) m (Add 'nowiki'.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Canonicity = | = Canonicity = | ||
I wonder if this would be better served with a <code>{{protocanon}}</code> template at the top of the page where necessary. Stories that are ''paracanon'' are probably listed as ''canon'' anyways, yes? And stories that are ''non-canon'' would simply not be shown in this website. So the only stories for which canonicity is anything other than ''canon'' are those which contain ''protocanon'', and we already have a template for that. | I wonder if this would be better served with a <code><nowiki>{{protocanon}}</nowiki></code> template at the top of the page where necessary. Stories that are ''paracanon'' are probably listed as ''canon'' anyways, yes? And stories that are ''non-canon'' would simply not be shown in this website. So the only stories for which canonicity is anything other than ''canon'' are those which contain ''protocanon'', and we already have a template for that. | ||
I also think this dispels the intended impression of an ''open-setting''. There is a sort of stamp of approval in having something recognized by you at all, Skunks&, but to emphasize canonicity as an intrinsic property that something may or, pointedly, ''may not'' have seems a little fraught, don't you think? | I also think this dispels the intended impression of an ''open-setting''. There is a sort of stamp of approval in having something recognized by you at all, Skunks&, but to emphasize canonicity as an intrinsic property that something may or, pointedly, ''may not'' have seems a little fraught, don't you think? | ||
[[User:Fireheart&|Fireheart&]] ([[User talk:Fireheart&|talk]]) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC) | [[User:Fireheart&|Fireheart&]] ([[User talk:Fireheart&|talk]]) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC) | ||