Template talk:Story - Revision history

Fireheart&: Formatting.

2024-02-08T16:16:43Z

Formatting.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 8 February 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I wonder if this would be better served with a <code><nowiki>{{protocanon}}</nowiki></code> template at the top of the page where necessary. Stories that are ''paracanon'' are probably listed as ''canon'' anyways, yes? And stories that are ''non-canon'' would simply not be shown in this website. So the only stories for which canonicity is anything other than ''canon'' are those which contain ''protocanon'', and we already have a template for that.		I wonder if this would be better served with a <code><nowiki>{{protocanon}}</nowiki></code> template at the top of the page where necessary. Stories that are ''paracanon'' are probably listed as ''canon'' anyways, yes? And stories that are ''non-canon'' would simply not be shown in this website. So the only stories for which canonicity is anything other than ''canon'' are those which contain ''protocanon'', and we already have a template for that.

	I also think this dispels the intended impression of an ''open~~-setting~~''. There is a sort of stamp of approval in having something recognized by you at all, Skunks&, but to emphasize canonicity as an intrinsic property that something may or, pointedly, ''may not'' have seems a little fraught, don't you think?		I also think this dispels the intended impression of an ''open'' setting. There is a sort of stamp of approval in having something recognized by you at all, Skunks&, but to emphasize canonicity as an intrinsic property that something may or, pointedly, ''may not'' have seems a little fraught, don't you think?
	[[User:Fireheart&\|Fireheart&]] ([[User talk:Fireheart&\|talk]]) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)		[[User:Fireheart&\|Fireheart&]] ([[User talk:Fireheart&\|talk]]) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Fireheart&: Add 'nowiki'.

2024-02-08T16:15:55Z

Add 'nowiki'.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 8 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= Canonicity =		= Canonicity =
	I wonder if this would be better served with a <code>{{protocanon}}</code> template at the top of the page where necessary. Stories that are ''paracanon'' are probably listed as ''canon'' anyways, yes? And stories that are ''non-canon'' would simply not be shown in this website. So the only stories for which canonicity is anything other than ''canon'' are those which contain ''protocanon'', and we already have a template for that.		I wonder if this would be better served with a <code><nowiki>{{protocanon}}</nowiki></code> template at the top of the page where necessary. Stories that are ''paracanon'' are probably listed as ''canon'' anyways, yes? And stories that are ''non-canon'' would simply not be shown in this website. So the only stories for which canonicity is anything other than ''canon'' are those which contain ''protocanon'', and we already have a template for that.

	I also think this dispels the intended impression of an ''open-setting''. There is a sort of stamp of approval in having something recognized by you at all, Skunks&, but to emphasize canonicity as an intrinsic property that something may or, pointedly, ''may not'' have seems a little fraught, don't you think?		I also think this dispels the intended impression of an ''open-setting''. There is a sort of stamp of approval in having something recognized by you at all, Skunks&, but to emphasize canonicity as an intrinsic property that something may or, pointedly, ''may not'' have seems a little fraught, don't you think?
	[[User:Fireheart&\|Fireheart&]] ([[User talk:Fireheart&\|talk]]) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)		[[User:Fireheart&\|Fireheart&]] ([[User talk:Fireheart&\|talk]]) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Fireheart&: Topic: Canonicity

2024-02-08T16:15:31Z

Topic: Canonicity

New page

= Canonicity =
I wonder if this would be better served with a <code>{{protocanon}}</code> template at the top of the page where necessary. Stories that are ''paracanon'' are probably listed as ''canon'' anyways, yes? And stories that are ''non-canon'' would simply not be shown in this website. So the only stories for which canonicity is anything other than ''canon'' are those which contain ''protocanon'', and we already have a template for that.

I also think this dispels the intended impression of an ''open-setting''. There is a sort of stamp of approval in having something recognized by you at all, Skunks&, but to emphasize canonicity as an intrinsic property that something may or, pointedly, ''may not'' have seems a little fraught, don't you think?
[[User:Fireheart&|Fireheart&]] ([[User talk:Fireheart&|talk]]) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)